BRAINDUMPS JN0-664 DOWNLOADS, BEST JN0-664 PREPARATION MATERIALS

Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads, Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials

Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads, Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials

Blog Article

Tags: Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads, Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials, Test JN0-664 Questions Fee, New JN0-664 Dumps Pdf, Pass JN0-664 Test

P.S. Free 2025 Juniper JN0-664 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassSureExam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UqNDqZXgZKb3pz1IyKBBt5MxFCDyvnMj

PassSureExam is the leading position in this field and famous for high pass rate. If you are headache about your qualification exams, our JN0-664 learning guide materials will be a great savior for you. Now it is your opportunity that we provide the best valid and professional JN0-664 study guide materials which have 100% pass rate. If you really want to Clear JN0-664 Exam and gain success one time, choosing us will be the wise thing for you. If you hesitate about us please pay attention on below about our satisfying service and high-quality JN0-664 guide torrent.

The advent of our JN0-664 study guide with three versions has helped more than 98 percent of exam candidates get the certificate successfully. Rather than insulating from the requirements of the JN0-664 real exam, our JN0-664 practice materials closely co-related with it. And their degree of customer’s satisfaction is escalating. Besides, many exam candidates are looking forward to the advent of new JN0-664 versions in the future.

>> Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads <<

Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials, Test JN0-664 Questions Fee

You can trust PassSureExam JN0-664 exam real questions and start preparation without wasting further time. We are quite confident that with the PassSureExam JN0-664 real exam questions you will get everything that you need to learn, prepare and pass the challenging Juniper JN0-664 Certification Exam easily.

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) Sample Questions (Q72-Q77):

NEW QUESTION # 72
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about the dual route reflectors within a cluster? (Choose two.)

  • A. RR1 and RR2 advertise routes learned from the clients to EBGP peers, using itself as the next hop.
  • B. RR1 and RR2 append the duster ID when advertising routes from dient to dient.
  • C. RR1 and RR2 must have the same duster ID to exchange routes learned from the client.
  • D. RR1 advertises routes from the client to RR2. using itself as the next hop.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
If you have redundant RRs with the same cluster ID, they will discard each other's routes. If they have different cluster IDs, they will accept each other's routes.
Since the route is advertised using ebgp, nexthop is the address of each of RR1 and RR2.


NEW QUESTION # 73
Your network is receiving the 203.0.113.0/24 network using EBGP from AS 64500 and AS 64501. Both of these advertisements have identical local-preference values, AS-path lengths, and BGP origin codes. You want to influence the way your AS sends traffic to the 203.0.113.0/24 network.
In this scenario, which attribute would you consider next when selecting the best path?

  • A. MED value
  • B. peer IP address
  • C. IGP metric
  • D. router ID

Answer: A

Explanation:
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the BGP path selection process and identify which attribute would be considered next in this scenario.
Background on BGP Path Selection
When multiple paths to the same destination are received via BGP, the router uses a step-by-step process to select the best path. The order of attributes considered is as follows (simplified for this scenario):
Highest Local Preference : The path with the highest local preference is preferred.
Shortest AS Path : The path with the shortest AS path length is preferred.
Lowest Origin Code : Paths with an origin code of IGP are preferred over EGP, and EGP is preferred over Incomplete.
Lowest MED (Multi-Exit Discriminator) : If the first three attributes are identical, the path with the lowest MED value is preferred.
eBGP over iBGP : eBGP paths are preferred over iBGP paths.
IGP Metric to Next Hop : The path with the lowest IGP metric to the next-hop router is preferred.
Router ID : If all else is equal, the path from the router with the lowest Router ID is preferred.
Peer IP Address : As a last tiebreaker, the path from the peer with the lowest IP address is preferred.
Scenario Analysis
In this scenario:
You are receiving the 203.0.113.0/24 network via EBGP from two different autonomous systems (AS 64500 and AS 64501).
Both advertisements have identical local-preference values , AS-path lengths , and BGP origin codes .
Given that the first three attributes in the BGP path selection process are identical, the next attribute to consider is the MED (Multi-Exit Discriminator) value.
Analysis of the Options
Option A: Router ID
Incorrect : The Router ID is considered much later in the BGP path selection process, only after other attributes like MED and IGP metric have been evaluated. Since MED is still relevant here, Router ID is not the next attribute to consider.
Option B: MED value
Correct : The MED value is used to influence inbound traffic from neighboring ASes. When local preference, AS path length, and origin code are identical, the path with the lowest MED value is preferred. This makes MED the next attribute to consider in this scenario.
Option C: Peer IP Address
Incorrect : The peer IP address is a tiebreaker used only at the very end of the BGP path selection process, after all other attributes have been evaluated. It is not relevant here because MED has not yet been considered.
Option D: IGP Metric
Incorrect : The IGP metric to the next-hop router is considered after MED. Since MED is still relevant in this scenario, IGP metric is not the next attribute to evaluate.
Final Answer
The correct answer is:
B . MED value
Summary
When local preference, AS path length, and origin code are identical, the MED value is the next attribute considered in the BGP path selection process.
MED is used to influence how traffic enters your AS from neighboring ASes.


NEW QUESTION # 74

Click the Exhibit button.
You are troubleshooting an issue for a customer site that uses 10.10.0.0/24 in AS 65224, but you see another AS in the AS path.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the cause of the problem?

  • A. The local AS is receiving two equal cost routes to 10.10.0.0/24.
  • B. The local AS is in the process of withdrawing the route from AS 65137.
  • C. AS 65000 is pre-pending AS 65137 to route advertisements.
  • D. AS 65137 is advertising the 10.10.0.0/24 prefix.

Answer: C

Explanation:
In the given exhibit, you are observing the BGP routing information for the prefix 10.10.0.0/24. The AS path for this prefix shows `65000 {65137 65224}`. To understand the issue, let's analyze each aspect of the information provided and the options given:
1. **AS Path Analysis**:
- The AS path attribute in BGP is a list of AS numbers that a route advertisement has traversed.
- In this case, the AS path `65000 {65137 65224}` indicates that the route to 10.10.0.0/24 has been advertised through AS 65000, which includes AS 65137 and AS 65224.
2. **Understanding AS Path Prepending**:
- AS path prepending is a technique used by AS administrators to artificially lengthen the AS path.
- By adding their own AS number multiple times into the AS path, they make a route less attractive to others.
- Here, AS 65000 is showing `65137` as part of its AS path, suggesting it might be prepending to manipulate routing decisions.
3. **Options Analysis**:
- **Option A**: "AS 65000 is pre-pending AS 65137 to route advertisements."
- This option suggests that AS 65000 is deliberately adding AS 65137 to the AS path. This matches the observed AS path, where AS 65000 has prepended `65137`.
- Therefore, this is the correct explanation.
- **Option B**: "The local AS is receiving two equal cost routes to 10.10.0.0/24."
- There is no evidence in the exhibit to support the presence of two equal-cost routes.
- **Option C**: "The local AS is in the process of withdrawing the route from AS 65137."
- Route withdrawal would not cause the AS path to include `65000 {65137 65224}`.
- **Option D**: "AS 65137 is advertising the 10.10.0.0/24 prefix."
- While AS 65137 is part of the path, it does not explain the presence of AS 65000 in the path, making this option incorrect.
**Conclusion**:
The AS path `65000 {65137 65224}` is indicative of AS 65000 prepending AS 65137. Therefore, the correct answer is:
**A. AS 65000 is pre-pending AS 65137 to route advertisements.**
**References**:
- Juniper Networks documentation on BGP AS path manipulation and prepending techniques.
- BGP Best Practices and Routing Policies: [Juniper Networks BGP Best
Practices](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/bgp-best-practices-routing-policie
- RFC 4271, A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4): [RFC 4271](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4271) which describes the behavior and attributes of BGP, including AS path prepending.


NEW QUESTION # 75
You have MAC addresses moving in your EVPN environment.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about the sequence number? (Choose two.)

  • A. It identifies MAC addresses that should be discarded.
  • B. It is advertised using a Type 2 message.
  • C. It resolves conflicting MAC address ownership claims.
  • D. It helps the local PE to identify the latest advertisement.

Answer: C,D


NEW QUESTION # 76
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, PIM-SM is configured on all routers, and Anycast-RP with Anycast-PIM is used for the discovery mechanism on RP1 and RP2. The interface metric values are shown for the OSPF area.
In this scenario, which two statements are correct about which RP is used? (Choose two.)

  • A. Source2 will use RP2 and Received will use RP2 for group 224.2.2.2.
  • B. Source1 will use RP1 and Receiver1 will use RP1 for group 224.1.1.1.
  • C. Source1 will use RP1 and Receiver1 will use RP2 for group 224.1 1 1
  • D. Source2 will use RP1 and Receiver2 will use RP1 for group 224.2.2.2.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
A sham link is a logical link between two PE routers that belong to the same OSPF area but are connected through an L3VPN. A sham link makes the PE routers appear as if they are directly connected, and prevents OSPF from preferring an intra-area back door link over the VPN backbone. A sham link creates an OSPF multihop neighborship between the PE routers using TCP port 646. The PEs exchange Type 1 OSPF LSAs instead of Type 3 OSPF LSAs for the L3VPN routes, which allows OSPF to use the correct metric for route selection1.


NEW QUESTION # 77
......

It is known to us that the knowledge workers have been playing an increasingly important role all over the world, since we have to admit the fact that the JN0-664 certification means a great deal to a lot of the people, especially these who want to change the present situation and get a better opportunity for development. If you also want to work your way up the ladder, preparing for the JN0-664 Exam will be the best and most suitable choice for you. If you are still hesitating whether you need to take the JN0-664 exam or not, you will lag behind other people.

Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials: https://www.passsureexam.com/JN0-664-pass4sure-exam-dumps.html

Juniper Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads No matter how good the product is users will encounter some difficult problems in the process of use, And the Software version of our JN0-664 study materials have the advantage of simulating the real exam, so that the candidates have more experience of the practicing the real exam questions, You can practice all the difficulties and hurdles which could be faced in an actual Juniper Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials exam.

What Is a Signal, Any additions in terms of users, group membership, or group JN0-664 policy will apply on the next replication cycle, No matter how good the product is users will encounter some difficult problems in the process of use.

Pass-Sure Braindumps JN0-664 Downloads & Perfect Best JN0-664 Preparation Materials & Updated Test JN0-664 Questions Fee

And the Software version of our JN0-664 Study Materials have the advantage of simulating the real exam, so that the candidates have more experience of the practicing the real exam questions.

You can practice all the difficulties and hurdles which could be faced in an actual Juniper exam, If JN0-664 exam change questions, we will get the first-hand real questions and our professional education experts will work out the right answers so that JN0-664 study materials produce.

Free demo download can make you be rest assured to buy; one-year free update of JN0-664 exam software after payment can assure you during your preparation for the exam.

DOWNLOAD the newest PassSureExam JN0-664 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UqNDqZXgZKb3pz1IyKBBt5MxFCDyvnMj

Report this page